glb_adm
01acfa3b40
Type checking / changes (push) Has been cancelled
Type checking / test (push) Has been cancelled
Type checking / typescript-summary (push) Has been cancelled
Node tests / changes (push) Has been cancelled
Node tests / test (push) Has been cancelled
Node tests / test-summary (push) Has been cancelled
Источник: https://github.com/nextcloud/spreed/archive/refs/tags/v22.0.12.tar.gz С этого коммита ветка официального Nextcloud Talk отрезана (решение владельца 2026-07-06). Все дальнейшие изменения — только наши; версии релизов: 22.0.12-f7.N.
63 lines
5.3 KiB
Gherkin
63 lines
5.3 KiB
Gherkin
Feature: chat-2/rich-messages
|
|
Background:
|
|
Given user "participant1" exists
|
|
Given user "participant2" exists
|
|
Given user "participant3" exists
|
|
Given user "participant3a" exists
|
|
|
|
Scenario: message without enrichable references has empty parameters
|
|
Given user "participant1" creates room "public room" (v4)
|
|
| roomType | 3 |
|
|
| roomName | room |
|
|
When user "participant1" sends message "Message without enrichable references" to room "public room" with 201
|
|
Then user "participant1" sees the following messages in room "public room" with 200
|
|
| room | actorType | actorId | actorDisplayName | message | messageParameters |
|
|
| public room | users | participant1 | participant1-displayname | Message without enrichable references | [] |
|
|
|
|
Scenario: message with mention to valid user has mention parameter
|
|
Given user "participant1" creates room "public room" (v4)
|
|
| roomType | 3 |
|
|
| roomName | room |
|
|
When user "participant1" sends message "Mention to @participant2" to room "public room" with 201
|
|
Then user "participant1" sees the following messages in room "public room" with 200
|
|
| room | actorType | actorId | actorDisplayName | message | messageParameters |
|
|
| public room | users | participant1 | participant1-displayname | Mention to {mention-user1} | {"mention-user1":{"type":"user","id":"participant2","name":"participant2-displayname","mention-id":"participant2"}} |
|
|
|
|
Scenario: message with mention to invalid user has mention parameter
|
|
Given user "participant1" creates room "public room" (v4)
|
|
| roomType | 3 |
|
|
| roomName | room |
|
|
When user "participant1" sends message "Mention to @unknownUser" to room "public room" with 201
|
|
Then user "participant1" sees the following messages in room "public room" with 200
|
|
| room | actorType | actorId | actorDisplayName | message | messageParameters |
|
|
| public room | users | participant1 | participant1-displayname | Mention to @unknownUser | [] |
|
|
|
|
Scenario: message with duplicated mention has single mention parameter
|
|
Given user "participant1" creates room "public room" (v4)
|
|
| roomType | 3 |
|
|
| roomName | room |
|
|
When user "participant1" sends message "Mention to @participant2 and @participant2 again" to room "public room" with 201
|
|
Then user "participant1" sees the following messages in room "public room" with 200
|
|
| room | actorType | actorId | actorDisplayName | message | messageParameters |
|
|
| public room | users | participant1 | participant1-displayname | Mention to {mention-user1} and {mention-user1} again | {"mention-user1":{"type":"user","id":"participant2","name":"participant2-displayname","mention-id":"participant2"}} |
|
|
|
|
Scenario: message with mentions to several users has mention parameters
|
|
Given user "participant1" creates room "public room" (v4)
|
|
| roomType | 3 |
|
|
| roomName | room |
|
|
When user "participant1" sends message "Mention to @participant2, @unknownUser, @participant2 again and @participant3" to room "public room" with 201
|
|
Then user "participant1" sees the following messages in room "public room" with 200
|
|
| room | actorType | actorId | actorDisplayName | message | messageParameters |
|
|
| public room | users | participant1 | participant1-displayname | Mention to {mention-user1}, @unknownUser, {mention-user1} again and {mention-user2} | {"mention-user1":{"type":"user","id":"participant2","name":"participant2-displayname","mention-id":"participant2"},"mention-user2":{"type":"user","id":"participant3","name":"participant3-displayname","mention-id":"participant3"}} |
|
|
|
|
Scenario: message with mentions of subname users (uid1 is fully part of uid2)
|
|
Given user "participant1" creates room "public room" (v4)
|
|
| roomType | 3 |
|
|
| roomName | room |
|
|
When user "participant1" sends message "Mention to @participant3 and @participant3a" to room "public room" with 201
|
|
When user "participant1" sends message "Mention to @participant3a and @participant3" to room "public room" with 201
|
|
Then user "participant1" sees the following messages in room "public room" with 200
|
|
| room | actorType | actorId | actorDisplayName | message | messageParameters |
|
|
| public room | users | participant1 | participant1-displayname | Mention to {mention-user1} and {mention-user2} | {"mention-user1":{"type":"user","id":"participant3a","name":"participant3a-displayname","mention-id":"participant3a"},"mention-user2":{"type":"user","id":"participant3","name":"participant3-displayname","mention-id":"participant3"}} |
|
|
| public room | users | participant1 | participant1-displayname | Mention to {mention-user2} and {mention-user1} | {"mention-user1":{"type":"user","id":"participant3a","name":"participant3a-displayname","mention-id":"participant3a"},"mention-user2":{"type":"user","id":"participant3","name":"participant3-displayname","mention-id":"participant3"}} |
|